Cybaverse vs HoneyHive
Cybaverse vs HoneyHive, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cybaverse is on 39/100 and HoneyHive on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Cybaverse
- headcount: 47 against 19
- LinkedIn following: 7,580 against 2,678
HoneyHive
- our overall score: 46/100 against 39/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 35/100
- funding raised: $10.0M against $7.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Cybaverse | HoneyHive |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered cybersecurity platform simplifying security for SMEs and MSPs. | HoneyHive helps enterprises trace, evaluate, monitor, and improve production AI agents across teams, stacks, and sensitive data environments. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, SaaS, AI-driven Security, Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP) | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Vulnerability Management, AI-driven Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Portsmouth, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cybaverse | HoneyHive |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | 19 |
| Total funding | $7.5M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,580 | 2,678 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cybaverse | HoneyHive |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 48/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 35/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cybaverse | HoneyHive |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, PostHog |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cybaverse vs HoneyHive: common questions
Which is better, Cybaverse or HoneyHive?
On our 0-100 score HoneyHive rates higher (46/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cybaverse and HoneyHive compare on the numbers?
Cybaverse leads on headcount (47 against 19), LinkedIn following (7,580 against 2,678). HoneyHive leads on our overall score (46/100 against 39/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 44/100), domain rating (58/100 against 35/100), funding raised ($10.0M against $7.5M).
Read the full Cybaverse review and pricing or the HoneyHive review and pricing. You can also browse other Cybaverse alternatives we track.