Cyactive vs SafeBreach
Cyactive vs SafeBreach, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyactive is on 40/100 and SafeBreach on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Cyactive
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SafeBreach
- our overall score: 61/100 against 40/100
- funding raised: $141M against $2.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Cyactive | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyactive was a predictive cybersecurity company that developed technology to foresee and prevent cyber threats. | SafeBreach offers a continuous security validation platform that simulates breach and attack scenarios to identify security gaps. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Predictive Analytics | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Breach and Attack Simulation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyactive | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 141 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $2.0M | $141M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D Extension |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 23,010 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyactive | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 32/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 16/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | Not published | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyactive | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cyactive vs SafeBreach: common questions
Which is better, Cyactive or SafeBreach?
On our 0-100 score SafeBreach rates higher (61/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyactive and SafeBreach compare on the numbers?
SafeBreach leads on our overall score (61/100 against 40/100), funding raised ($141M against $2.0M).
Read the full Cyactive review and pricing or the SafeBreach review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyactive alternatives we track.