Cyabra vs Pixmole Technologies
Cyabra vs Pixmole Technologies, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyabra is on 57/100 and Pixmole Technologies on 29/100.
Where each one leads
Cyabra
- our overall score: 57/100 against 29/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 4/100
- headcount: 75 against 11
- LinkedIn following: 10,800 against 1,658
Pixmole Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cyabra | Pixmole Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Restoring trust and authenticity for global enterprises and governments. | Image copyright monitoring and enforcement using cyber intelligence and photography. |
| Category | New Media, Fake News, Deepfake, Media | New Media, Copyright, Detection, Copyright Enforcement |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B,B2G | B2C, B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyabra | Pixmole Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 75 | 11 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +34.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $13.3M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Bootstrapped |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,800 | 1,658 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyabra | Pixmole Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 11/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 48/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 4/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyabra | Pixmole Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Cyabra vs Pixmole Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Cyabra or Pixmole Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Cyabra rates higher (57/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyabra and Pixmole Technologies compare on the numbers?
Cyabra leads on our overall score (57/100 against 29/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 21/100), domain rating (60/100 against 4/100), headcount (75 against 11), LinkedIn following (10,800 against 1,658).
Read the full Cyabra review and pricing or the Pixmole Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyabra alternatives we track.