Cyabra vs MarqVision
Cyabra vs MarqVision, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyabra is on 57/100 and MarqVision on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Cyabra
- our overall score: 57/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 38/100
MarqVision
- funding raised: $69.0M against $13.3M
At a glance
| Measure | Cyabra | MarqVision |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Restoring trust and authenticity for global enterprises and governments. | AI-powered brand protection and anti-counterfeiting platform for e-commerce. |
| Category | New Media, Fake News, Deepfake, Media | Brand Protection, Anti-Counterfeiting, Intellectual Property Protection, E-commerce |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B,B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Seoul, South Korea |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyabra | MarqVision |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 75 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +34.5% | Not published |
| Open roles | Not published | 20 |
| Total funding | $13.3M | $69.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,800 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyabra | MarqVision |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyabra | MarqVision |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Cyabra vs MarqVision: common questions
Which is better, Cyabra or MarqVision?
On our 0-100 score Cyabra rates higher (57/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyabra and MarqVision compare on the numbers?
Cyabra leads on our overall score (57/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 38/100). MarqVision leads on funding raised ($69.0M against $13.3M).
Read the full Cyabra review and pricing or the MarqVision review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyabra alternatives we track.