Cyabra vs Insoundz
Cyabra vs Insoundz, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyabra is on 57/100 and Insoundz on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Cyabra
- our overall score: 57/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 75 against 23
- headcount growth: +34.5% against -14.2%
- LinkedIn following: 10,800 against 2,599
Insoundz
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cyabra | Insoundz |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Restoring trust and authenticity for global enterprises and governments. | Generative AI audio enhancement company providing customizable solutions for businesses. |
| Category | New Media, Fake News, Deepfake, Media | New Media, Audio to Screen, Generative AI, Media |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B,B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyabra | Insoundz |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 75 | 23 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +34.5% | -14.2% |
| Total funding | $13.3M | $12.7M |
| Latest round | Series A | SAFE |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,800 | 2,599 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyabra | Insoundz |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 40/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyabra | Insoundz |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Cyabra vs Insoundz: common questions
Which is better, Cyabra or Insoundz?
On our 0-100 score Cyabra rates higher (57/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyabra and Insoundz compare on the numbers?
Cyabra leads on our overall score (57/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 36/100), domain rating (60/100 against 40/100), headcount (75 against 23), headcount growth (+34.5% against -14.2%), LinkedIn following (10,800 against 2,599).
Read the full Cyabra review and pricing or the Insoundz review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyabra alternatives we track.