Cust2Mate vs Supersmart
Cust2Mate vs Supersmart, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cust2Mate is on 41/100 and Supersmart on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Cust2Mate
- domain rating: 37/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 73 against 31
- LinkedIn following: 4,082 against 3,226
Supersmart
- our overall score: 53/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 36/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cust2Mate | Supersmart |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Smart shopping carts that automate self-checkout and enhance the in-store retail experience. | Supersmart provides AI-driven automated checkout and plug-and-play solutions for brick-and-mortar retailers, transforming stores into frictionless digital experiences. |
| Category | RetailTech, Smart Shopping Carts, Self-Checkout, Computer Vision | Retail, Basket IoT, RetailTech, Computer Vision |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cust2Mate | Supersmart |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 73 | 31 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -9.5% |
| Total funding | Not published | $35.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,082 | 3,226 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cust2Mate | Supersmart |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 19/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | Not published | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 37/100 | 26/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cust2Mate | Supersmart |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cust2Mate vs Supersmart: common questions
Which is better, Cust2Mate or Supersmart?
On our 0-100 score Supersmart rates higher (53/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cust2Mate and Supersmart compare on the numbers?
Cust2Mate leads on domain rating (37/100 against 26/100), headcount (73 against 31), LinkedIn following (4,082 against 3,226). Supersmart leads on our overall score (53/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (36/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Cust2Mate review and pricing or the Supersmart review and pricing. You can also browse other Cust2Mate alternatives we track.