Cursor (Anysphere) vs RWX
Cursor (Anysphere) vs RWX, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor (Anysphere) is on 68/100 and RWX on 41/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor (Anysphere)
- our overall score: 68/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 41/100
- funding raised: $4.8B against $12.0M
RWX
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor (Anysphere) | RWX |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cursor is an AI code editor built to make you extraordinarily productive by coding with AI. | The dev cloud platform built for AI-driven software engineering. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Code Editor, AI Coding Assistant | Artificial Intelligence, Software Development, Cloud Computing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Columbus, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor (Anysphere) | RWX |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 125 | Not published |
| Total funding | $4.8B | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| Valuation | $29B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 43,638 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor (Anysphere) | RWX |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 41/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 71/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor (Anysphere) | RWX |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor (Anysphere) | RWX |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI-Powered Code Completion, Codebase Awareness, Natural Language Editing, Background Agents, Bug Bot Integration, Privacy Mode | Not published |
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
Cursor (Anysphere) vs RWX: common questions
Which is better, Cursor (Anysphere) or RWX?
On our 0-100 score Cursor (Anysphere) rates higher (68/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor (Anysphere) and RWX compare on the numbers?
Cursor (Anysphere) leads on our overall score (68/100 against 41/100), domain rating (90/100 against 41/100), funding raised ($4.8B against $12.0M).
Read the full Cursor (Anysphere) review and pricing or the RWX review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor (Anysphere) alternatives we track.