Cursor vs Silfium Analytics
Cursor vs Silfium Analytics, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and Silfium Analytics on 2/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 2/100
- LinkedIn following: 361,335 against 3
Silfium Analytics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor | Silfium Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. | Quantitative consultancy for complex risk, data, and software problems, applying actuarial science, AI, and quantitative analytics. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor | Quantitative Analytics, Actuarial Science, Data Analytics, AI Consulting |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2022 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Hounslow, England |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor | Silfium Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,081 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.9B | Not published |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Not published |
| Valuation | $50B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 361,335 | 3 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor | Silfium Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 2/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 93/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor | Silfium Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor | Silfium Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
Cursor vs Silfium Analytics: common questions
Which is better, Cursor or Silfium Analytics?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 2/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor and Silfium Analytics compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 2/100), LinkedIn following (361,335 against 3).
Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the Silfium Analytics review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.