Cursor vs Random Labs
Cursor vs Random Labs, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and Random Labs on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 27/100
- funding raised: $2.9B against $500K
Random Labs
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 47/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor | Random Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. | Industry's first 'swarm native' autonomous coding agent. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor | Artificial Intelligence, Software Development, Developer Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, USA |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor | Random Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,081 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.9B | $500K |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Seed |
| Valuation | $50B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 361,335 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor | Random Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 28/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 26/100 |
| Quality | 93/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor | Random Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor | Random Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
Cursor vs Random Labs: common questions
Which is better, Cursor or Random Labs?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor and Random Labs compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 48/100), domain rating (90/100 against 27/100), funding raised ($2.9B against $500K). Random Labs leads on agent readiness (56/100 against 47/100).
Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the Random Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.