Cursor vs poolside
Cursor vs poolside, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and poolside on 76/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor
- domain rating: 90/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 1,081 against 213
- LinkedIn following: 361,335 against 28,616
poolside
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor | poolside |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. | AI coding models and pair programmer built for on-device execution with privacy-first architecture. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, Code Generation, AI Coding Assistant |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Software | SaaS / IDE Plugin |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor | poolside |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,081 | 213 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.9B | $2.8B |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series A |
| Valuation | $50B | $4K |
| LinkedIn followers | 361,335 | 28,616 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor | poolside |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 76/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 77/100 |
| Quality | 93/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor | poolside |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Sveltekit, Svelte, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor | poolside |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Proprietary Learning Approach, On-premise Deployment & Data Sovereignty, Foundation Model Development, Integrated Development Ecosystem, Model Factory Infrastructure |
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Cursor | poolside |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“Poolside. https://sifted.eu/articles/poolside-raises-126m-relocated-france-news [link]”r/
Cursor vs poolside: common questions
Which is better, Cursor or poolside?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 76/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor and poolside compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on domain rating (90/100 against 73/100), headcount (1,081 against 213), LinkedIn following (361,335 against 28,616).
What do real users say about Cursor and poolside?
poolside: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the poolside review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.