Cursor vs Nordstone
Cursor vs Nordstone, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and Nordstone on 23/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 23/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 26/100
Nordstone
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 47/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor | Nordstone |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. | Nordstone is a global team of app developers, designers, strategists, and growth hackers trusted by UK startups and scaleups. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor | Mobile App Development, Web Application Development, AI/ML Integration, Software Development |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2022 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor | Nordstone |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,081 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.9B | Not published |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Not published |
| Valuation | $50B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 361,335 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor | Nordstone |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 23/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 93/100 | 38/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 26/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor | Nordstone |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Ghost | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor | Nordstone |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
Cursor vs Nordstone: common questions
Which is better, Cursor or Nordstone?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 23/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor and Nordstone compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 23/100), domain rating (90/100 against 26/100). Nordstone leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 47/100).
Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the Nordstone review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.