Cursor vs Mio
Cursor vs Mio, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and Mio on 40/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 40/100
- funding raised: $2.9B against $2.2M
Mio
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor | Mio |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. | An AI colleague that lives inside Slack to assist with recurring tasks and advance work. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor | Artificial Intelligence, Productivity Software, Workplace Technology, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor | Mio |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,081 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.9B | $2.2M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Pre-Seed |
| Valuation | $50B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 361,335 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor | Mio |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 40/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 32/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 93/100 | 52/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor | Mio |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor | Mio |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
Cursor vs Mio: common questions
Which is better, Cursor or Mio?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor and Mio compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 40/100), funding raised ($2.9B against $2.2M).
Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the Mio review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.