Cursor vs Kilo Code

Cursor vs Kilo Code, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and Kilo Code on 24/100.

Cursor logo
CursorAn AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently.
Try Cursor
Kilo Code logo
Kilo CodeOpen-source, agentic AI coding tool for VS Code, combining Cline and Roo Code features.
Try Kilo Code

Where each one leads

Cursor

  • our overall score: 77/100 against 24/100
  • domain rating: 90/100 against 76/100
  • headcount: 1,081 against 46
  • LinkedIn following: 361,335 against 7,513

Kilo Code

  • agent readiness: 55/100 against 47/100

At a glance

MeasureCursorKilo Code
What it isAn AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently.Open-source, agentic AI coding tool for VS Code, combining Cline and Roo Code features.
CategoryArtificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code EditorAgentic AI, AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools
Sells toBusiness modelB2BOpen Source
OfferingSoftwareSoftware
Founded2022Not published
HeadquartersSan Francisco, United StatesSan Francisco, United States
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureCursorKilo Code
Employees1,08146
Headcount growthLast 12 months+500.0%Not published
Total funding$2.9BNot published
Latest roundFunding RoundNot published
Valuation$50BNot published
LinkedIn followers361,3357,513

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureCursorKilo Code
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating77/10024/100
Traction60/10017/100
Team30/100Not published
Community8/100Not published
Search visibility83/10043/100
Quality93/100Not published
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (47/100)D (55/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10090/10076/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureCursorKilo Code
HostingVercelVercel
CDNVercelVercel
CMSGhostNot detected
FrameworksNext.js, Tailwind CSSNext.js, Tailwind CSS
Open sourceYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes

Product and pricing

MeasureCursorKilo Code
Current offer50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or UltraNot published

Cursor vs Kilo Code: common questions

Which is better, Cursor or Kilo Code?

On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 24/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Cursor and Kilo Code compare on the numbers?

Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 24/100), domain rating (90/100 against 76/100), headcount (1,081 against 46), LinkedIn following (361,335 against 7,513). Kilo Code leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 47/100).

Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the Kilo Code review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.