Cursor vs JSX Tool
Cursor vs JSX Tool, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and JSX Tool on 11/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 11/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 11/100
- headcount: 1,081 against 2
JSX Tool
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor | JSX Tool |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. | A browser extension for React developers to quickly locate components and files for precise LLM interactions. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor | Active Developer Tools, B2B, Productivity, Design |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor | JSX Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,081 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.9B | Not published |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Not published |
| Valuation | $50B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 361,335 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor | JSX Tool |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 11/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 93/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 11/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor | JSX Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor | JSX Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Cursor | JSX Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“Launch HN: JSX Tool (YC F25) – A Browser Dev-Panel IDE for React.”r/hackernews
Cursor vs JSX Tool: common questions
Which is better, Cursor or JSX Tool?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 11/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor and JSX Tool compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 11/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 25/100), domain rating (90/100 against 11/100), headcount (1,081 against 2).
What do real users say about Cursor and JSX Tool?
JSX Tool: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/hackernews.
Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the JSX Tool review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.