Cursor vs Galileo AI
Cursor vs Galileo AI, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and Galileo AI on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 49/100
- headcount: 1,081 against 30
Galileo AI
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 47/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor | Galileo AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. | AI-powered UI design generation from text prompts. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor | Artificial Intelligence, Design Tools, UI/UX Design, Code Generation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Software | SaaS |
| Founded | 2022 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor | Galileo AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,081 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.9B | Not published |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Not published |
| Valuation | $50B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 361,335 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor | Galileo AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 15/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 93/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | C (61/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor | Galileo AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor | Galileo AI |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
Cursor vs Galileo AI: common questions
Which is better, Cursor or Galileo AI?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor and Galileo AI compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 49/100), headcount (1,081 against 30). Galileo AI leads on agent readiness (61/100 against 47/100).
Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the Galileo AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.