Cursor vs Fine
Cursor vs Fine, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and Fine on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 1,081 against 4
- headcount growth: +500.0% against +34.8%
- funding raised: $2.9B against $11.0M
- LinkedIn following: 361,335 against 807
Fine
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor | Fine |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. | AI-powered software development platform automating coding tasks with autonomous agents. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor | Generative AI, Enterprise, Development, Code |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor | Fine |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,081 | 4 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | +34.8% |
| Total funding | $2.9B | $11.0M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Seed |
| Valuation | $50B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 361,335 | 807 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor | Fine |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 42/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 93/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor | Fine |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor | Fine |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
Cursor vs Fine: common questions
Which is better, Cursor or Fine?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor and Fine compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 25/100), domain rating (90/100 against 52/100), headcount (1,081 against 4), headcount growth (+500.0% against +34.8%), funding raised ($2.9B against $11.0M), LinkedIn following (361,335 against 807).
Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the Fine review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.