Cursor vs Filament AI
Cursor vs Filament AI, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and Filament AI on 20/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 20/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 1,081 against 49
- LinkedIn following: 361,335 against 3,231
Filament AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor | Filament AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. | Filament builds AI-powered tools for software development, focusing on code generation and debugging. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor | Filament AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,081 | 49 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.9B | Not published |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Not published |
| Valuation | $50B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 361,335 | 3,231 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor | Filament AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 17/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 93/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 25/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor | Filament AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor | Filament AI |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
Cursor vs Filament AI: common questions
Which is better, Cursor or Filament AI?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor and Filament AI compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 20/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 41/100), domain rating (90/100 against 25/100), headcount (1,081 against 49), LinkedIn following (361,335 against 3,231).
Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the Filament AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.