Cursor vs Entire
Cursor vs Entire, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and Entire on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 4/100
- funding raised: $2.9B against $60.0M
Entire
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor | Entire |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. | An open-source tool to help developers manage code written by AI agents. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, Agentic AI, AI Coding Assistant |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor | Entire |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,081 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.9B | $60.0M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Seed |
| Valuation | $50B | $300M |
| LinkedIn followers | 361,335 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor | Entire |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 6/100 |
| Quality | 93/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 4/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor | Entire |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor | Entire |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
Cursor vs Entire: common questions
Which is better, Cursor or Entire?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor and Entire compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 49/100), domain rating (90/100 against 4/100), funding raised ($2.9B against $60.0M).
Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the Entire review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.