Curity Identity Server vs Ping Identity
Curity Identity Server vs Ping Identity, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Curity Identity Server is on Not scored yet and Ping Identity on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Curity Identity Server
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 45/100
- headcount growth: +52.1% against +21.9%
Ping Identity
- domain rating: 82/100 against 71/100
- headcount: 2,370 against 59
- LinkedIn following: 160,033 against 3,145
At a glance
| Measure | Curity Identity Server | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Robust platform for authentication and authorization, securing access for humans, AI agents, and APIs. | Provider of identity security solutions for the digital enterprise. |
| Category | Identity & Access Management Software, API Security, Cybersecurity, Authentication | Identity & Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity, Identity & Access Management, Authentication |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | Denver, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Curity Identity Server | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 59 | 2,370 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +52.1% | +21.9% |
| Total funding | Not published | $111M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,145 | 160,033 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Curity Identity Server | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | Not published | 60/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Curity Identity Server | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Curity Identity Server vs Ping Identity: common questions
Which is better, Curity Identity Server or Ping Identity?
On our 0-100 score Ping Identity rates higher (60/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Curity Identity Server and Ping Identity compare on the numbers?
Curity Identity Server leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 45/100), headcount growth (+52.1% against +21.9%). Ping Identity leads on domain rating (82/100 against 71/100), headcount (2,370 against 59), LinkedIn following (160,033 against 3,145).
Read the full Curity Identity Server review and pricing or the Ping Identity review and pricing. You can also browse other Curity Identity Server alternatives we track.

