Curesponse vs Ultima Genomics
Curesponse vs Ultima Genomics, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Curesponse is on 55/100 and Ultima Genomics on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Curesponse
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 38/100
- funding raised: $28.0M against $15.0M
Ultima Genomics
- our overall score: 68/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 56/100 against 17/100
- headcount: 298 against 14
- headcount growth: -1.5% against -4.3%
- LinkedIn following: 29,210 against 2,570
At a glance
| Measure | Curesponse | Ultima Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Personalized medicine startup focused on accurate cancer treatment through advanced diagnostics and functional drug sensitivity testing. | Unleashing the power of genomics at scale for biological advances and human health. |
| Category | Life Sciences, Cancer, Genomics, Genome Sequencing | Life Sciences, Biotech, Bioinformatics, Genomics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Rehovot, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Curesponse | Ultima Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 298 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -4.3% | -1.5% |
| Total funding | $28.0M | $15.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,570 | 29,210 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Curesponse | Ultima Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 17/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Curesponse | Ultima Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Astro |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Curesponse vs Ultima Genomics: common questions
Which is better, Curesponse or Ultima Genomics?
On our 0-100 score Ultima Genomics rates higher (68/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Curesponse and Ultima Genomics compare on the numbers?
Curesponse leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 38/100), funding raised ($28.0M against $15.0M). Ultima Genomics leads on our overall score (68/100 against 55/100), domain rating (56/100 against 17/100), headcount (298 against 14), headcount growth (-1.5% against -4.3%), LinkedIn following (29,210 against 2,570).
Read the full Curesponse review and pricing or the Ultima Genomics review and pricing. You can also browse other Curesponse alternatives we track.