Curesponse vs PhaseV
Curesponse vs PhaseV, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Curesponse is on 55/100 and PhaseV on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Curesponse
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 42/100
PhaseV
- domain rating: 33/100 against 17/100
- headcount: 61 against 14
- headcount growth: +173.2% against -4.3%
- funding raised: $65.0M against $28.0M
- LinkedIn following: 6,602 against 2,570
At a glance
| Measure | Curesponse | PhaseV |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Personalized medicine startup focused on accurate cancer treatment through advanced diagnostics and functional drug sensitivity testing. | Develops a platform for adaptive clinical trial design and closed-loop execution. |
| Category | Life Sciences, Cancer, Genomics, Genome Sequencing | Life Sciences, Clinical Trials, Optimization, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Curesponse | PhaseV |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 61 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -4.3% | +173.2% |
| Total funding | $28.0M | $65.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,570 | 6,602 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Curesponse | PhaseV |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 17/100 | 33/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Curesponse | PhaseV |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Curesponse vs PhaseV: common questions
Which is better, Curesponse or PhaseV?
On our 0-100 score PhaseV rates higher (56/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Curesponse and PhaseV compare on the numbers?
Curesponse leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 42/100). PhaseV leads on domain rating (33/100 against 17/100), headcount (61 against 14), headcount growth (+173.2% against -4.3%), funding raised ($65.0M against $28.0M), LinkedIn following (6,602 against 2,570).
Read the full Curesponse review and pricing or the PhaseV review and pricing. You can also browse other Curesponse alternatives we track.