Curesponse vs OncoDecipher
Curesponse vs OncoDecipher, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Curesponse is on 55/100 and OncoDecipher on 43/100.
Where each one leads
Curesponse
- our overall score: 55/100 against 43/100
- funding raised: $28.0M against $1.0M
OncoDecipher
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Curesponse | OncoDecipher |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Personalized medicine startup focused on accurate cancer treatment through advanced diagnostics and functional drug sensitivity testing. | OncoDecipher uses silent mutations in cancer genomes to predict cancer type and survival probability. |
| Category | Life Sciences, Cancer, Genomics, Genome Sequencing | Life Sciences, Cancer, Oncology, Mutation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Cambridge, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Curesponse | OncoDecipher |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -4.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $28.0M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,570 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Curesponse | OncoDecipher |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 43/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 30/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 3/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 52/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 17/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Curesponse | OncoDecipher |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
Curesponse vs OncoDecipher: common questions
Which is better, Curesponse or OncoDecipher?
On our 0-100 score Curesponse rates higher (55/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Curesponse and OncoDecipher compare on the numbers?
Curesponse leads on our overall score (55/100 against 43/100), funding raised ($28.0M against $1.0M).
Read the full Curesponse review and pricing or the OncoDecipher review and pricing. You can also browse other Curesponse alternatives we track.