CureMD vs Phreesia
CureMD vs Phreesia, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CureMD is on 21/100 and Phreesia on 61/100.
Where each one leads
CureMD
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 50/100
- LinkedIn following: 196,923 against 68,147
Phreesia
- our overall score: 61/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | CureMD | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-based EHR and practice management software for healthcare providers. | A healthcare software platform automating patient check-in, scheduling, payments, and administrative tasks. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, EHR, Practice Management Software | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Patient Engagement, Healthcare Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1996 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CureMD | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,689 | 1,532 |
| Total funding | Not published | $120M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 196,923 | 68,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CureMD | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 21/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (64/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CureMD | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | CureMD | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 2 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“I got the CureMD offer, but they lowballed me soo bad. They offered me lower than my current salary eventhough I made my salary expectations very clear from first HR phone call. CureMD has ZERO professionalism and wasting people's time.”r/developersPak
CureMD vs Phreesia: common questions
Which is better, CureMD or Phreesia?
On our 0-100 score Phreesia rates higher (61/100 against 21/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CureMD and Phreesia compare on the numbers?
CureMD leads on agent readiness (64/100 against 50/100), LinkedIn following (196,923 against 68,147). Phreesia leads on our overall score (61/100 against 21/100).
What do real users say about CureMD and Phreesia?
CureMD: 0 positive and 2 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/developersPak.
Read the full CureMD review and pricing or the Phreesia review and pricing. You can also browse other CureMD alternatives we track.