Culture Amp vs Juno Journey
Culture Amp vs Juno Journey, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Culture Amp is on 64/100 and Juno Journey on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Culture Amp
- our overall score: 64/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 27/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 35/100
- headcount: 957 against 57
- funding raised: $137M against $22.5M
- LinkedIn following: 121,545 against 11,003
Juno Journey
- headcount growth: +8.0% against +3.9%
At a glance
| Measure | Culture Amp | Juno Journey |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Employee feedback and analytics platform for building better workplaces. | Personalized employee development platform for onboarding, growth, and retention. |
| Category | HR Tech, Employee Experience, People Analytics, Performance Management | Enterprise, HR, Employee Management, HR Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Culture Amp | Juno Journey |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 957 | 57 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.9% | +8.0% |
| Total funding | $137M | $22.5M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 121,545 | 11,003 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Culture Amp | Juno Journey |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | F (27/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Culture Amp | Juno Journey |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Crisp, HubSpot |
Culture Amp vs Juno Journey: common questions
Which is better, Culture Amp or Juno Journey?
On our 0-100 score Culture Amp rates higher (64/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Culture Amp and Juno Journey compare on the numbers?
Culture Amp leads on our overall score (64/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (43/100 against 27/100), domain rating (80/100 against 35/100), headcount (957 against 57), funding raised ($137M against $22.5M), LinkedIn following (121,545 against 11,003). Juno Journey leads on headcount growth (+8.0% against +3.9%).
Read the full Culture Amp review and pricing or the Juno Journey review and pricing. You can also browse other Culture Amp alternatives we track.