Cudo Compute vs Iris Energy
Cudo Compute vs Iris Energy, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cudo Compute is on 40/100 and Iris Energy on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Cudo Compute
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Iris Energy
- our overall score: 59/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 600 against 140
- funding raised: $9.7B against $100M
At a glance
| Measure | Cudo Compute | Iris Energy |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Distributed GPU cloud | GPU cloud data center operator |
| Category | Neocloud, AI Infrastructure, GPU, Cloud Computing | Neocloud, AI Infrastructure, GPU, Cloud Computing |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Childress, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cudo Compute | Iris Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 140 | 600 |
| Total funding | $100M | $9.7B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cudo Compute | Iris Energy |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cudo Compute | Iris Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Payments | Stripe | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | Freshdesk |
Cudo Compute vs Iris Energy: common questions
Which is better, Cudo Compute or Iris Energy?
On our 0-100 score Iris Energy rates higher (59/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cudo Compute and Iris Energy compare on the numbers?
Iris Energy leads on our overall score (59/100 against 40/100), domain rating (58/100 against 50/100), headcount (600 against 140), funding raised ($9.7B against $100M).
Read the full Cudo Compute review and pricing or the Iris Energy review and pricing. You can also browse other Cudo Compute alternatives we track.