Cua vs Steel.dev
Cua vs Steel.dev, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cua is on 39/100 and Steel.dev on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Cua
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Steel.dev
- our overall score: 58/100 against 39/100
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 46/100
- funding raised: $17.0M against $500K
At a glance
| Measure | Cua | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cua provides an open-source framework and cloud desktops for AI agents to control operating systems and desktop applications across Linux, Windows, macOS, and Android. | Cloud-based browser API for AI agents, simplifying web automation with anti-bot protection and session persistence. |
| Category | AI Agent, Agentic AI, Autonomous Systems, Cloud Infrastructure | Developer Tools, API Platform, Workflow Automation, AI Agents |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2025 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cua | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | Not published |
| Total funding | $500K | $17.0M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,527 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cua | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 16/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cua | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Cua | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 3.0/5 from 1 vote |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Hermes Agent now supports computer use via TryCua on Windows and Linux in addition to existing macOS support Computer Use docs: https://hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/docs/user-guide/features/computer-use https://reddit.com/link/1ucuwk5/vide”r/hermesagent
Cua vs Steel.dev: common questions
Which is better, Cua or Steel.dev?
On our 0-100 score Steel.dev rates higher (58/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cua and Steel.dev compare on the numbers?
Steel.dev leads on our overall score (58/100 against 39/100), agent readiness (54/100 against 46/100), funding raised ($17.0M against $500K).
What do real users say about Cua and Steel.dev?
Cua: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/hermesagent.
Read the full Cua review and pricing or the Steel.dev review and pricing. You can also browse other Cua alternatives we track.