CTERA Networks vs SpiderOak
CTERA Networks vs SpiderOak, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CTERA Networks is on 59/100 and SpiderOak on 42/100.
Where each one leads
CTERA Networks
- our overall score: 59/100 against 42/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 40/100
- funding raised: $135M against $20.0M
SpiderOak
- domain rating: 71/100 against 60/100
At a glance
| Measure | CTERA Networks | SpiderOak |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CTERA Networks provides a distributed cloud file storage platform for enterprises, enabling secure data access and collaboration across global locations. | Secure, private cloud storage and collaboration for individuals and businesses. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Storage, Cloud Storage | Cloud Storage, Data Security, Collaboration Software, End-to-End Encryption |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2008 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Petah Tikva, Israel | Kansas City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CTERA Networks | SpiderOak |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 198 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +26.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $135M | $20.0M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,555 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CTERA Networks | SpiderOak |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 42/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CTERA Networks | SpiderOak |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
CTERA Networks vs SpiderOak: common questions
Which is better, CTERA Networks or SpiderOak?
On our 0-100 score CTERA Networks rates higher (59/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CTERA Networks and SpiderOak compare on the numbers?
CTERA Networks leads on our overall score (59/100 against 42/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 40/100), funding raised ($135M against $20.0M). SpiderOak leads on domain rating (71/100 against 60/100).
Read the full CTERA Networks review and pricing or the SpiderOak review and pricing. You can also browse other CTERA Networks alternatives we track.