CTERA Networks vs MinerEye
CTERA Networks vs MinerEye, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CTERA Networks is on 59/100 and MinerEye on 53/100.
Where each one leads
CTERA Networks
- our overall score: 59/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 198 against 5
- headcount growth: +26.5% against -21.3%
- funding raised: $135M against $14.6M
- LinkedIn following: 7,555 against 852
MinerEye
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CTERA Networks | MinerEye |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CTERA Networks provides a distributed cloud file storage platform for enterprises, enabling secure data access and collaboration across global locations. | MinerEye provides AI-powered data governance and protection solutions for unstructured and dark data across enterprise repositories. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Storage, Cloud Storage | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Data Protection, Privacy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Petah Tikva, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CTERA Networks | MinerEye |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 198 | 5 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +26.5% | -21.3% |
| Total funding | $135M | $14.6M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,555 | 852 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CTERA Networks | MinerEye |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CTERA Networks | MinerEye |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Hetzner |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
CTERA Networks vs MinerEye: common questions
Which is better, CTERA Networks or MinerEye?
On our 0-100 score CTERA Networks rates higher (59/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CTERA Networks and MinerEye compare on the numbers?
CTERA Networks leads on our overall score (59/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 21/100), domain rating (60/100 against 41/100), headcount (198 against 5), headcount growth (+26.5% against -21.3%), funding raised ($135M against $14.6M), LinkedIn following (7,555 against 852).
Read the full CTERA Networks review and pricing or the MinerEye review and pricing. You can also browse other CTERA Networks alternatives we track.