CTERA Networks vs FalkorDB
CTERA Networks vs FalkorDB, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CTERA Networks is on 59/100 and FalkorDB on 54/100.
Where each one leads
CTERA Networks
- our overall score: 59/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 198 against 19
- funding raised: $135M against $3.0M
- LinkedIn following: 7,555 against 4,097
FalkorDB
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 45/100
- headcount growth: +98.3% against +26.5%
At a glance
| Measure | CTERA Networks | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CTERA Networks provides a distributed cloud file storage platform for enterprises, enabling secure data access and collaboration across global locations. | Queryable property graph database using sparse matrices and linear algebra for graph queries. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Storage, Cloud Storage | Enterprise, Database, Generative AI, Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Petah Tikva, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CTERA Networks | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 198 | 19 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +26.5% | +98.3% |
| Total funding | $135M | $3.0M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,555 | 4,097 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CTERA Networks | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CTERA Networks | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
CTERA Networks vs FalkorDB: common questions
Which is better, CTERA Networks or FalkorDB?
On our 0-100 score CTERA Networks rates higher (59/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CTERA Networks and FalkorDB compare on the numbers?
CTERA Networks leads on our overall score (59/100 against 54/100), headcount (198 against 19), funding raised ($135M against $3.0M), LinkedIn following (7,555 against 4,097). FalkorDB leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 45/100), headcount growth (+98.3% against +26.5%).
Read the full CTERA Networks review and pricing or the FalkorDB review and pricing. You can also browse other CTERA Networks alternatives we track.