CryoPort vs Thermo Fisher Scientific
CryoPort vs Thermo Fisher Scientific, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CryoPort is on 29/100 and Thermo Fisher Scientific on 78/100.
Where each one leads
CryoPort
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 22/100
Thermo Fisher Scientific
- our overall score: 78/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 51/100
- funding raised: $5.5B against $25.0M
At a glance
| Measure | CryoPort | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global provider of integrated temperature-controlled supply chain solutions for the life sciences industry. | Global leader in serving science, providing analytical instruments, consumables, and services for research, diagnostics, and manufacturing. |
| Category | Life Sciences, Logistics, Biotechnology, Pharmaceuticals | Life Sciences, Analytical Instruments, Laboratory Equipment, Biotechnology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 1999 | 1956 |
| Headquarters | Nashville, United States | Waltham, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CryoPort | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 100,104 |
| Open roles | 25 | Not published |
| Total funding | $25.0M | $5.5B |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Debt |
| Valuation | Not published | $220B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 2,298,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CryoPort | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 29/100 | 78/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CryoPort | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
CryoPort vs Thermo Fisher Scientific: common questions
Which is better, CryoPort or Thermo Fisher Scientific?
On our 0-100 score Thermo Fisher Scientific rates higher (78/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CryoPort and Thermo Fisher Scientific compare on the numbers?
CryoPort leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 22/100). Thermo Fisher Scientific leads on our overall score (78/100 against 29/100), domain rating (86/100 against 51/100), funding raised ($5.5B against $25.0M).
Read the full CryoPort review and pricing or the Thermo Fisher Scientific review and pricing. You can also browse other CryoPort alternatives we track.