CrowdStrike vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings
CrowdStrike vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CrowdStrike is on 62/100 and Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings on 47/100.
Where each one leads
CrowdStrike
- our overall score: 62/100 against 47/100
- funding raised: $1.2B against $55.0M
Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CrowdStrike | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-native endpoint security and threat intelligence platform powered by AI. | Cybersecurity solutions for network, cloud, and hybrid workforces, leveraging threat intelligence and consulting. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Security Software, Threat Intelligence | Cybersecurity, Network Security, Cloud Security, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | Not published | B2B |
| Offering | Software | SaaS | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Austin, United States | תל אביב - יפו, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CrowdStrike | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 22,232 |
| Total funding | $1.2B | $55.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| Valuation | $7 | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 1,908,870 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CrowdStrike | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 90/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 87/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CrowdStrike | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
CrowdStrike vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings: common questions
Which is better, CrowdStrike or Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings?
On our 0-100 score CrowdStrike rates higher (62/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings compare on the numbers?
CrowdStrike leads on our overall score (62/100 against 47/100), funding raised ($1.2B against $55.0M).
Read the full CrowdStrike review and pricing or the Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings review and pricing. You can also browse other CrowdStrike alternatives we track.