CrowdStrike vs Cybereason
CrowdStrike vs Cybereason, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CrowdStrike is on 62/100 and Cybereason on 56/100.
Where each one leads
CrowdStrike
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 87/100 against 76/100
- funding raised: $1.2B against $934M
Cybereason
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CrowdStrike | Cybereason |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-native endpoint security and threat intelligence platform powered by AI. | Cybereason provides a comprehensive cybersecurity platform that prevents, detects, and responds to cyber attacks using AI-driven endpoint protection. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Security Software, Threat Intelligence | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Forensics |
| Sells toBusiness model | Not published | B2B |
| Offering | Software | SaaS | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Austin, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CrowdStrike | Cybereason |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 676 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -20.0% |
| Total funding | $1.2B | $934M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series H |
| Valuation | $7 | $350M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 88,003 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CrowdStrike | Cybereason |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 90/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 87/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CrowdStrike | Cybereason |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
What users say
| Measure | CrowdStrike | Cybereason |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads |
“I currently have Cybereason and I've had a good experience with them, but if I'm being honest my IT group is small and doesn't have a ton of time to manage A/V. Cybereason has been good in that we've had no major virus issues, but their int”r/cybersecurity
CrowdStrike vs Cybereason: common questions
Which is better, CrowdStrike or Cybereason?
On our 0-100 score CrowdStrike rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CrowdStrike and Cybereason compare on the numbers?
CrowdStrike leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 33/100), domain rating (87/100 against 76/100), funding raised ($1.2B against $934M).
What do real users say about CrowdStrike and Cybereason?
Cybereason: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/cybersecurity.
Read the full CrowdStrike review and pricing or the Cybereason review and pricing. You can also browse other CrowdStrike alternatives we track.

