CropX vs xFarm Technologies
CropX vs xFarm Technologies, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CropX is on 58/100 and xFarm Technologies on 46/100.
Where each one leads
CropX
- our overall score: 58/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 21/100
- funding raised: $50.4M against $1.0M
xFarm Technologies
- headcount: 263 against 134
- LinkedIn following: 42,261 against 27,973
At a glance
| Measure | CropX | xFarm Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CropX provides an agronomic farm management system that synthesizes data from soil to sky for advanced soil and crop intelligence. | A digital platform for precision agriculture. |
| Category | Agritech, Analytics, Irrigation, Digital Twin | Agritech, Precision Agriculture, Data Analytics, AgTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Milan, Italy |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CropX | xFarm Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 134 | 263 |
| Total funding | $50.4M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | Debt | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,973 | 42,261 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CropX | xFarm Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 57/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CropX | xFarm Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
What users say
| Measure | CropX | xFarm Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“Dalle stazioni meteo installate nei campi ai sensori che misurano umidità e bagnatura fogliare, fino ai sistemi di supporto alle decisioni per la difesa fitosanitaria del mais: la nuova partnership tra Fattorie Garofalo e xFarm Technologies”r/Italianfoodtody
CropX vs xFarm Technologies: common questions
Which is better, CropX or xFarm Technologies?
On our 0-100 score CropX rates higher (58/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CropX and xFarm Technologies compare on the numbers?
CropX leads on our overall score (58/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 21/100), funding raised ($50.4M against $1.0M). xFarm Technologies leads on headcount (263 against 134), LinkedIn following (42,261 against 27,973).
What do real users say about CropX and xFarm Technologies?
xFarm Technologies: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Italianfoodtody.
Read the full CropX review and pricing or the xFarm Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other CropX alternatives we track.