CropX vs Neolithics.ai
CropX vs Neolithics.ai, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CropX is on 58/100 and Neolithics.ai on 39/100.
Where each one leads
CropX
- our overall score: 58/100 against 39/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 134 against 21
- LinkedIn following: 27,973 against 2,456
Neolithics.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CropX | Neolithics.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CropX provides an agronomic farm management system that synthesizes data from soil to sky for advanced soil and crop intelligence. | AI-powered hyperspectral imaging for automated crop detection, classification, and sorting on conveyors. |
| Category | Agritech, Analytics, Irrigation, Digital Twin | Agritech, Remote Sensing, AgTech, FoodTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CropX | Neolithics.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 134 | 21 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +20.1% |
| Total funding | $50.4M | Not published |
| Latest round | Debt | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,973 | 2,456 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CropX | Neolithics.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 39/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 13/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 43/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 26/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CropX | Neolithics.ai |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
CropX vs Neolithics.ai: common questions
Which is better, CropX or Neolithics.ai?
On our 0-100 score CropX rates higher (58/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CropX and Neolithics.ai compare on the numbers?
CropX leads on our overall score (58/100 against 39/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 21/100), domain rating (59/100 against 26/100), headcount (134 against 21), LinkedIn following (27,973 against 2,456).
Read the full CropX review and pricing or the Neolithics.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other CropX alternatives we track.