CropX vs Taranis
CropX vs Taranis, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CropX is on 58/100 and Taranis on 68/100.
Where each one leads
CropX
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 39/100
- LinkedIn following: 27,973 against 19,038
Taranis
- our overall score: 68/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 204 against 134
- funding raised: $99.6M against $50.4M
At a glance
| Measure | CropX | Taranis |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CropX provides an agronomic farm management system that synthesizes data from soil to sky for advanced soil and crop intelligence. | Taranis is a precision agriculture intelligence platform using computer vision and AI to monitor fields and prevent crop yield loss. |
| Category | Agritech, Analytics, Irrigation, Digital Twin | Agritech, Crop Monitoring, Satellite Imagery, AgTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Westfield, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CropX | Taranis |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 134 | 204 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +6.0% |
| Total funding | $50.4M | $99.6M |
| Latest round | Debt | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,973 | 19,038 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CropX | Taranis |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 76/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CropX | Taranis |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
CropX vs Taranis: common questions
Which is better, CropX or Taranis?
On our 0-100 score Taranis rates higher (68/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CropX and Taranis compare on the numbers?
CropX leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 39/100), LinkedIn following (27,973 against 19,038). Taranis leads on our overall score (68/100 against 58/100), headcount (204 against 134), funding raised ($99.6M against $50.4M).
Read the full CropX review and pricing or the Taranis review and pricing. You can also browse other CropX alternatives we track.