CropX vs SupPlant
CropX vs SupPlant, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CropX is on 58/100 and SupPlant on 66/100.
Where each one leads
CropX
- domain rating: 59/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 134 against 55
- LinkedIn following: 27,973 against 15,340
SupPlant
- our overall score: 66/100 against 58/100
At a glance
| Measure | CropX | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CropX provides an agronomic farm management system that synthesizes data from soil to sky for advanced soil and crop intelligence. | Agritech company providing AI-driven irrigation solutions for water-stressed agriculture, optimizing crop yields and conserving water. |
| Category | Agritech, Analytics, Irrigation, Digital Twin | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Water Management, Crop Optimization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Afula, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CropX | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 134 | 55 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -13.4% |
| Total funding | $50.4M | $62.9M |
| Latest round | Debt | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $30.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,973 | 15,340 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CropX | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CropX | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
CropX vs SupPlant: common questions
Which is better, CropX or SupPlant?
On our 0-100 score SupPlant rates higher (66/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CropX and SupPlant compare on the numbers?
CropX leads on domain rating (59/100 against 38/100), headcount (134 against 55), LinkedIn following (27,973 against 15,340). SupPlant leads on our overall score (66/100 against 58/100).
Read the full CropX review and pricing or the SupPlant review and pricing. You can also browse other CropX alternatives we track.