CropX vs PlantVoice
CropX vs PlantVoice, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CropX is on 58/100 and PlantVoice on 53/100.
Where each one leads
CropX
- our overall score: 58/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 134 against 20
- funding raised: $50.4M against $540K
- LinkedIn following: 27,973 against 2,026
PlantVoice
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CropX | PlantVoice |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CropX provides an agronomic farm management system that synthesizes data from soil to sky for advanced soil and crop intelligence. | Agronomic platform integrating real-time plant physiological data with environmental data for better farming decisions. |
| Category | Agritech, Analytics, Irrigation, Digital Twin | Agritech, Artificial Intelligence, Biosensors, Sustainable Agriculture |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Bolzano, Italy |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CropX | PlantVoice |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 134 | 20 |
| Total funding | $50.4M | $540K |
| Latest round | Debt | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,973 | 2,026 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CropX | PlantVoice |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 42/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 21/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CropX | PlantVoice |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
CropX vs PlantVoice: common questions
Which is better, CropX or PlantVoice?
On our 0-100 score CropX rates higher (58/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CropX and PlantVoice compare on the numbers?
CropX leads on our overall score (58/100 against 53/100), domain rating (59/100 against 21/100), headcount (134 against 20), funding raised ($50.4M against $540K), LinkedIn following (27,973 against 2,026).
Read the full CropX review and pricing or the PlantVoice review and pricing. You can also browse other CropX alternatives we track.