CropX vs InnerPlant
CropX vs InnerPlant, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CropX is on 58/100 and InnerPlant on 62/100.
Where each one leads
CropX
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 134 against 49
- LinkedIn following: 27,973 against 9,617
InnerPlant
- our overall score: 62/100 against 58/100
At a glance
| Measure | CropX | InnerPlant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CropX provides an agronomic farm management system that synthesizes data from soil to sky for advanced soil and crop intelligence. | Agritech startup using optical sensors to enable crops to communicate their needs. |
| Category | Agritech, Analytics, Irrigation, Digital Twin | Agritech, Sensor, Nutrient, Crop |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Davis, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CropX | InnerPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 134 | 49 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +18.1% |
| Total funding | $50.4M | $51.7M |
| Latest round | Debt | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,973 | 9,617 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CropX | InnerPlant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 42/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CropX | InnerPlant |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
CropX vs InnerPlant: common questions
Which is better, CropX or InnerPlant?
On our 0-100 score InnerPlant rates higher (62/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CropX and InnerPlant compare on the numbers?
CropX leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 45/100), domain rating (59/100 against 42/100), headcount (134 against 49), LinkedIn following (27,973 against 9,617). InnerPlant leads on our overall score (62/100 against 58/100).
Read the full CropX review and pricing or the InnerPlant review and pricing. You can also browse other CropX alternatives we track.