CropX vs Fermata
CropX vs Fermata, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CropX is on 58/100 and Fermata on 54/100.
Where each one leads
CropX
- our overall score: 58/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 134 against 40
- funding raised: $50.4M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 27,973 against 5,797
Fermata
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CropX | Fermata |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CropX provides an agronomic farm management system that synthesizes data from soil to sky for advanced soil and crop intelligence. | AI-powered plant monitoring solutions for precise greenhouse management. |
| Category | Agritech, Analytics, Irrigation, Digital Twin | Agritech, Disease Control, Crop Monitoring, Greenhouse |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CropX | Fermata |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 134 | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +50.3% |
| Total funding | $50.4M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Debt | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,973 | 5,797 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CropX | Fermata |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CropX | Fermata |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Astro, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight | PostHog |
CropX vs Fermata: common questions
Which is better, CropX or Fermata?
On our 0-100 score CropX rates higher (58/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CropX and Fermata compare on the numbers?
CropX leads on our overall score (58/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 37/100), domain rating (59/100 against 31/100), headcount (134 against 40), funding raised ($50.4M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (27,973 against 5,797).
Read the full CropX review and pricing or the Fermata review and pricing. You can also browse other CropX alternatives we track.