CropX vs DeepAgro
CropX vs DeepAgro, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CropX is on 58/100 and DeepAgro on 46/100.
Where each one leads
CropX
- our overall score: 58/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 134 against 53
- funding raised: $50.4M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 27,973 against 15,998
DeepAgro
- agent readiness: 70/100 against 51/100
At a glance
| Measure | CropX | DeepAgro |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CropX provides an agronomic farm management system that synthesizes data from soil to sky for advanced soil and crop intelligence. | An AgTech startup focused on precision agriculture. |
| Category | Agritech, Analytics, Irrigation, Digital Twin | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, AI-Optimized Crop Genetics, Data Analytics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Buenos Aires, Argentina |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CropX | DeepAgro |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 134 | 53 |
| Total funding | $50.4M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | Debt | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,973 | 15,998 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CropX | DeepAgro |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | B (70/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 20/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CropX | DeepAgro |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4, Segment, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel |
CropX vs DeepAgro: common questions
Which is better, CropX or DeepAgro?
On our 0-100 score CropX rates higher (58/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CropX and DeepAgro compare on the numbers?
CropX leads on our overall score (58/100 against 46/100), domain rating (59/100 against 20/100), headcount (134 against 53), funding raised ($50.4M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (27,973 against 15,998). DeepAgro leads on agent readiness (70/100 against 51/100).
Read the full CropX review and pricing or the DeepAgro review and pricing. You can also browse other CropX alternatives we track.