CRITIFENCE vs CyberX Labs
CRITIFENCE vs CyberX Labs, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CRITIFENCE is on 20/100 and CyberX Labs on 61/100.
Where each one leads
CRITIFENCE
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
CyberX Labs
- our overall score: 61/100 against 20/100
- domain rating: 57/100 against 19/100
- LinkedIn following: 12,065 against 286
At a glance
| Measure | CRITIFENCE | CyberX Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Proactive cyber defense for critical infrastructure, SCADA, and OT networks. | CyberX Labs provides complete visibility and real-time threat detection for industrial control systems and operational technology (OT) networks. |
| Category | Industrial, Cybersecurity, SCADA, Industrial IoT | Industrial, Cybersecurity, Control Systems, SCADA |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2G |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CRITIFENCE | CyberX Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 51 | 47 |
| Total funding | Not published | $45.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 286 | 12,065 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CRITIFENCE | CyberX Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 20/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 17/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 19/100 | 57/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CRITIFENCE | CyberX Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
What users say
| Measure | CRITIFENCE | CyberX Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“Security vendors. I've seen some discussed but was wondering who here has any experience with the Claroty's, Nozomi's CyberX Labs out there. We have put the three I mentioned to a POC, and thus far all have impressed for different reasons.”r/PLC
CRITIFENCE vs CyberX Labs: common questions
Which is better, CRITIFENCE or CyberX Labs?
On our 0-100 score CyberX Labs rates higher (61/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CRITIFENCE and CyberX Labs compare on the numbers?
CyberX Labs leads on our overall score (61/100 against 20/100), domain rating (57/100 against 19/100), LinkedIn following (12,065 against 286).
What do real users say about CRITIFENCE and CyberX Labs?
CyberX Labs: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/PLC.
Read the full CRITIFENCE review and pricing or the CyberX Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other CRITIFENCE alternatives we track.

