CRiskCo vs StoneCo
CRiskCo vs StoneCo, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CRiskCo is on 34/100 and StoneCo on 67/100.
Where each one leads
CRiskCo
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 21/100
StoneCo
- our overall score: 67/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 17/100
- headcount: 13,867 against 13
- LinkedIn following: 2,482,372 against 1,938
At a glance
| Measure | CRiskCo | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time credit and compliance intelligence for Mexico. Trusted by leading financial institutions to automate underwriting and monitor risk using SAT API data. | Brazilian fintech providing integrated financial and software solutions for merchants of all sizes. |
| Category | Fintech, Credit, Credit Risk, Lending | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | São Paulo, Brazil |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CRiskCo | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 13 | 13,867 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +3.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.5B |
| Latest round | Strategic | IPO |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,938 | 2,482,372 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CRiskCo | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 34/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 11/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 17/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CRiskCo | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Hetzner | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Lovable | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | CRiskCo | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 3 negative across 4 threads |
“StoneCo is a fairly dope SA fintech company with quality financials yet rapidly increasing short interest. The dumb fucks who think they can chip away at this little gem deserve to be eaten alive by the intrepid marketeers going in on share”r/wallstreetbets
CRiskCo vs StoneCo: common questions
Which is better, CRiskCo or StoneCo?
On our 0-100 score StoneCo rates higher (67/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CRiskCo and StoneCo compare on the numbers?
CRiskCo leads on agent readiness (44/100 against 21/100). StoneCo leads on our overall score (67/100 against 34/100), domain rating (53/100 against 17/100), headcount (13,867 against 13), LinkedIn following (2,482,372 against 1,938).
What do real users say about CRiskCo and StoneCo?
StoneCo: 1 positive and 3 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/wallstreetbets.
Read the full CRiskCo review and pricing or the StoneCo review and pricing. You can also browse other CRiskCo alternatives we track.