CRiskCo vs Pagaya Investments
CRiskCo vs Pagaya Investments, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CRiskCo is on 34/100 and Pagaya Investments on 65/100.
Where each one leads
CRiskCo
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Pagaya Investments
- our overall score: 65/100 against 34/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 17/100
- headcount: 463 against 13
- LinkedIn following: 70,861 against 1,938
At a glance
| Measure | CRiskCo | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time credit and compliance intelligence for Mexico. Trusted by leading financial institutions to automate underwriting and monitor risk using SAT API data. | AI-powered network enabling financial institutions to expand customer access and scale lending. |
| Category | Fintech, Credit, Credit Risk, Lending | Fintech, Asset Management, Fixed Income, Credit |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CRiskCo | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 13 | 463 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -14.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.4B |
| Latest round | Strategic | Credit Facility |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.3B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,938 | 70,861 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CRiskCo | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 34/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 11/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 17/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CRiskCo | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Hetzner | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Lovable | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
CRiskCo vs Pagaya Investments: common questions
Which is better, CRiskCo or Pagaya Investments?
On our 0-100 score Pagaya Investments rates higher (65/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CRiskCo and Pagaya Investments compare on the numbers?
Pagaya Investments leads on our overall score (65/100 against 34/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 44/100), domain rating (59/100 against 17/100), headcount (463 against 13), LinkedIn following (70,861 against 1,938).
Read the full CRiskCo review and pricing or the Pagaya Investments review and pricing. You can also browse other CRiskCo alternatives we track.

