Cribl vs evo.ninja
Cribl vs evo.ninja, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cribl is on 61/100 and evo.ninja on 14/100.
Where each one leads
Cribl
- our overall score: 61/100 against 14/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 300 against 1
- LinkedIn following: 115,003 against 1,009
evo.ninja
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cribl | evo.ninja |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The data engine for observability and security, enabling choice and control over IT and security data. | Launch interactive AI streamers in minutes with customizable, life-like agents that multistream across platforms. |
| Category | Data Management, Cybersecurity, Observability, AI Infrastructure | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Generative AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | Not published |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cribl | evo.ninja |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 300 | 1 |
| Total funding | $715M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| Valuation | $3.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 115,003 | 1,009 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cribl | evo.ninja |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 14/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 3/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 42/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cribl | evo.ninja |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cribl | evo.ninja |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Dynamic Task Adaptation, Specialized Agent Personas, Intelligent Execution Loop, CLI & UI Operation, Session Workspace Management, OpenAI & SERP API Integration |
What users say
| Measure | Cribl | evo.ninja |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“Meet Evo.ninja: The AI That Learns in Real-Time 🥇. Meet Evo.ninja: The AI That Learns in Real-Time 🥇 Hey Reddit! Big news: https://evo.ninja won first place at SuperAGI's Autonomous Agents Hackathon! What Is Evo.ninja? An AI agent that ev”r/AutoGPT
Cribl vs evo.ninja: common questions
Which is better, Cribl or evo.ninja?
On our 0-100 score Cribl rates higher (61/100 against 14/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cribl and evo.ninja compare on the numbers?
Cribl leads on our overall score (61/100 against 14/100), domain rating (74/100 against 42/100), headcount (300 against 1), LinkedIn following (115,003 against 1,009).
What do real users say about Cribl and evo.ninja?
evo.ninja: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/AutoGPT.
Read the full Cribl review and pricing or the evo.ninja review and pricing. You can also browse other Cribl alternatives we track.