Cradle vs Theradaptive
Cradle vs Theradaptive, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cradle is on 69/100 and Theradaptive on 45/100.
Where each one leads
Cradle
- our overall score: 69/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 112 against 31
- funding raised: $102M against $32.2M
Theradaptive
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cradle | Theradaptive |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cradle Bio B.V. is a Dutch, Swiss biotechnology company that develops software using machine learning for protein engineering. It was founded in 2021 and is base | Biotech company developing targeted regenerative therapeutics using a proprietary protein engineering platform for tissue repair. |
| Category | Biotech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Drug Discovery | Biotech, Regenerative Medicine, Protein Engineering, Medical Devices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Frederick, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cradle | Theradaptive |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 112 | 31 |
| Total funding | $102M | $32.2M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,926 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cradle | Theradaptive |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 45/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 17/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 56/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 28/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cradle | Theradaptive |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Framer | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Cradle vs Theradaptive: common questions
Which is better, Cradle or Theradaptive?
On our 0-100 score Cradle rates higher (69/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cradle and Theradaptive compare on the numbers?
Cradle leads on our overall score (69/100 against 45/100), domain rating (53/100 against 28/100), headcount (112 against 31), funding raised ($102M against $32.2M).
Read the full Cradle review and pricing or the Theradaptive review and pricing. You can also browse other Cradle alternatives we track.