Cradle vs Seevix
Cradle vs Seevix, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cradle is on 69/100 and Seevix on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Cradle
- our overall score: 69/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 14/100
- headcount: 112 against 13
- funding raised: $102M against $11.0M
- LinkedIn following: 27,926 against 1,908
Seevix
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cradle | Seevix |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cradle Bio B.V. is a Dutch, Swiss biotechnology company that develops software using machine learning for protein engineering. It was founded in 2021 and is base | Seevix Material Sciences develops and produces SVX, a proprietary spider silk protein, for various industrial and medical applications. |
| Category | Biotech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Drug Discovery | Biotech, Life Sciences, Material Sciences, Synthetic Biology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Rehovot, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cradle | Seevix |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 112 | 13 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -59.4% |
| Total funding | $102M | $11.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,926 | 1,908 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cradle | Seevix |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 17/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 56/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 14/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cradle | Seevix |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Framer | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Cradle vs Seevix: common questions
Which is better, Cradle or Seevix?
On our 0-100 score Cradle rates higher (69/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cradle and Seevix compare on the numbers?
Cradle leads on our overall score (69/100 against 52/100), domain rating (53/100 against 14/100), headcount (112 against 13), funding raised ($102M against $11.0M), LinkedIn following (27,926 against 1,908).
Read the full Cradle review and pricing or the Seevix review and pricing. You can also browse other Cradle alternatives we track.