Coworker.ai vs Culture Amp
Coworker.ai vs Culture Amp, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Coworker.ai is on 19/100 and Culture Amp on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Coworker.ai
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 43/100
- headcount growth: +57.0% against +3.9%
Culture Amp
- our overall score: 64/100 against 19/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 957 against 28
- LinkedIn following: 121,545 against 4,122
At a glance
| Measure | Coworker.ai | Culture Amp |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for chat, coworking, and coding, offering frontier-quality outputs at reduced costs and integrating with over 50 connectors. | Employee feedback and analytics platform for building better workplaces. |
| Category | HR Tech, Employee Engagement, Internal Communications, AI Tool | HR Tech, Employee Experience, People Analytics, Performance Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Coworker.ai | Culture Amp |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 28 | 957 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +57.0% | +3.9% |
| Open roles | 6 | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $137M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,122 | 121,545 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Coworker.ai | Culture Amp |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 19/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 15/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Coworker.ai | Culture Amp |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Coworker.ai | Culture Amp |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Reviewing coworkers’ AI-generated PRs. Coworkers started using AI agents to speed up implementing stories. The generated code is pretty bad with lots of unnecessary irrelevant changes, incorrect commands, wrong values, etc. I’m fine with AI”r/ExperiencedDevs
Coworker.ai vs Culture Amp: common questions
Which is better, Coworker.ai or Culture Amp?
On our 0-100 score Culture Amp rates higher (64/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Coworker.ai and Culture Amp compare on the numbers?
Coworker.ai leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 43/100), headcount growth (+57.0% against +3.9%). Culture Amp leads on our overall score (64/100 against 19/100), domain rating (80/100 against 51/100), headcount (957 against 28), LinkedIn following (121,545 against 4,122).
What do real users say about Coworker.ai and Culture Amp?
Coworker.ai: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ExperiencedDevs.
Read the full Coworker.ai review and pricing or the Culture Amp review and pricing. You can also browse other Coworker.ai alternatives we track.