Cover Whale vs Planck
Cover Whale vs Planck, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cover Whale is on 44/100 and Planck on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Cover Whale
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Planck
- our overall score: 65/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 45/100 against 40/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cover Whale | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Insurtech platform providing instant commercial auto insurance quotes and policies. | Commercial insurance data platform enabling instant and accurate business underwriting. |
| Category | InsurTech, Commercial Insurance, API Platform, Underwriting Automation | Fintech, Insurance, Underwriting, InsurTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cover Whale | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 75 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -7.5% |
| Total funding | $67.5M | $71.0M |
| Latest round | Growth Equity | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $250M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 6,433 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cover Whale | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 44/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 4/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 40/100 | 45/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cover Whale | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Flyio | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Fathom | Google Tag Manager |
Cover Whale vs Planck: common questions
Which is better, Cover Whale or Planck?
On our 0-100 score Planck rates higher (65/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cover Whale and Planck compare on the numbers?
Planck leads on our overall score (65/100 against 44/100), domain rating (45/100 against 40/100).
Read the full Cover Whale review and pricing or the Planck review and pricing. You can also browse other Cover Whale alternatives we track.