Cover Genius vs feld.ai
Cover Genius vs feld.ai, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cover Genius is on 67/100 and feld.ai on 3/100.
Where each one leads
Cover Genius
- our overall score: 67/100 against 3/100
- domain rating: 65/100 against 19/100
- headcount: 589 against 7
- LinkedIn following: 34,565 against 266
feld.ai
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 48/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cover Genius | feld.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global insurtech for embedded protection, protecting customers of the world's largest digital companies. | feld.ai automates document processing with AI, offering classification, extraction, and validation with 100% EU-hosting. |
| Category | InsurTech, Embedded Finance, API Platform, Digital Payments | Document Processing AI, Data Extraction, Document Classification, Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Feldkirch, Austria |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cover Genius | feld.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 589 | 7 |
| Total funding | $170M | Not published |
| Latest round | Growth | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.9B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 34,565 | 266 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cover Genius | feld.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 3/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 19/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cover Genius | feld.ai |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Plausible |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cover Genius vs feld.ai: common questions
Which is better, Cover Genius or feld.ai?
On our 0-100 score Cover Genius rates higher (67/100 against 3/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cover Genius and feld.ai compare on the numbers?
Cover Genius leads on our overall score (67/100 against 3/100), domain rating (65/100 against 19/100), headcount (589 against 7), LinkedIn following (34,565 against 266). feld.ai leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 48/100).
Read the full Cover Genius review and pricing or the feld.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Cover Genius alternatives we track.