Covariant vs Pickey
Covariant vs Pickey, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Covariant is on 61/100 and Pickey on 31/100.
Where each one leads
Covariant
- our overall score: 61/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 0/100
- headcount: 43 against 1
- LinkedIn following: 27,403 against 101
Pickey
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Covariant | Pickey |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Covariant builds a universal AI platform, the Covariant Brain, to enable robots to see, reason, and act autonomously in dynamic real-world environments like warehouses. | Pickey's Hand Vision uses computer vision to improve worker productivity and reduce errors in logistics. |
| Category | Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Warehouse Robotics, Computer Vision | Retail, Self-Checkout, LogisticsTech, Computer Vision |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Emeryville, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Covariant | Pickey |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 43 | 1 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -38.5% |
| Total funding | $80.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Bootstrapped |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,403 | 101 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Covariant | Pickey |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 31/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 3/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 42/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (23/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 0/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Covariant | Pickey |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Netlify | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Wix |
Covariant vs Pickey: common questions
Which is better, Covariant or Pickey?
On our 0-100 score Covariant rates higher (61/100 against 31/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Covariant and Pickey compare on the numbers?
Covariant leads on our overall score (61/100 against 31/100), domain rating (60/100 against 0/100), headcount (43 against 1), LinkedIn following (27,403 against 101).
Read the full Covariant review and pricing or the Pickey review and pricing. You can also browse other Covariant alternatives we track.